100-ticket audit
- Intent map
- Issue volume breakdown
- Draft automation opportunities
- Top policy gaps
For early traction, pricing should feel like a clear service-backed win, not an abstract enterprise automation license.
| Plan | Ideal for | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Audit | Founders proving demand | Free 100-ticket analysis and recommendations |
| Starter | One brand with a busy queue | Reply drafts, labels, summaries, basic approvals |
| Ops team | Agencies, BPOs, or multi-store groups | More playbooks, more approval layers, more reporting |
Good when the queue is dominated by WISMO, late tracking updates, and customer anxiety around delivery promises.
Good when policy edge cases, manual judgment, and compensation risk are hurting consistency.
Good when founders or managers need to understand queue health and issue clusters without reviewing every ticket.
No. The current product story starts with exported policies, tickets, orders, and tracking data so teams can validate a workflow quickly.
No. The pricing and trust model assumes human approval for refunds, credits, and other sensitive decisions.
Usually another workflow, another queue, or a manager summary layer. Expansion follows adjacent use cases, not a sudden platform-wide rollout.